Hp Omen Gaming Full Hd Ips 173 Notebook Review
HP Omen 15: Gaming laptop with good battery life
Affordable entry-level device! With the Omen series, HP offers gaming laptops that are directly aimed at gamers. Not only does HP cover the high-stop segment here, merely it likewise offers attractive devices for the entry level. With the current Omen 15, we certainly have an interesting device on the marketplace that doesn't need to hibernate in terms of price-operation ratio.
The HP Omen laptops are primarily aimed at gamers who are exclusively focused on performance. Furthermore, the Omen series is too available outside the high-priced range. HP shows this exactly with the Omen 15, which costs almost 1,250 Euros (~$i,480) in our configuration. In this case, anIntel Core i5-10300H serves equally the processor, and Nvidia'southGeForce GTX 1660 Ti is used as the graphics carte. Those who prefer AMD can also go the Omen xv with a Ryzen five 4600H. At that place's no pregnant departure in price compared to our test sample with the Intel SoC. Both have xvi GB of RAM and are equipped with 512 GB of SSD storage space.
Simply if you need more ability, yous can also get the Omen 15 with aCore i7-10750H CPU and a GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q GPU. All the same, this will set you back at to the lowest degree 600 Euros (~$711) more. A mid-range option is also available with theGeForce RTX 2060 and the Intel Core i5-10300H. Hither, the price is nearly 1,370 Euros (~$1,622) at the time of testing.
In terms of the comparison devices for this review, we have express ourselves to current 15.6-inch devices that are somewhat at the same price level. You can find an overview under the HP Omen 15 specifications.
Display
15.60 inch xvi:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, LGD05FE, IPS, glossy: no, 144 Hz
Weight
ii.137 kg ( = 75.38 oz / 4.71 pounds), Power Supply: 652 thou ( = 23 oz / 1.44 pounds)
Note: The manufacturer may utilize components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
The case is made of plastic and is completely black. At beginning glance, the matte surface looks attractive, but when you start to use the device, information technology chop-chop becomes articulate that fingerprints are literally attracted to it. The stability is good, although the chapeau and base of operations unit of measurement tin can be twisted hands and produce a tranquillity creaking sound. However, exerting targeted pressure doesn't affect the panel, so that no changes in color are visible on it. Moreover, the hinges are smooth, and the lid tin be opened with ane hand. This results in slight wobbling, but nosotros just saw this happen for a brusque fourth dimension. At 180 degrees, the aperture angle is very broad and much larger than with comparable devices.
The HP Omen 15 is a 15.6-inch laptop and thus just as large every bit its competitors. The footprint'southward dimensions are only visibly smaller when comparing the laptop to the older Omen 15. With its 2.i kilograms, our Omen xv is also in the same league equally its opponents. Westeighing ii.iv kilograms, the Omen 15-dc was significantly heavier at its time. You have to take another 650 grams into account when information technology comes to the power adapter.
❌
In terms of the port configuration, the HP Omen 15 offers a solid foundation with a few minor extras. For example, the Mini DisplayPort, which is no longer oftentimes found, and a USB-C port with Thunderbolt 3 support should be mentioned as extras. There are also iii conventional USB Type-A ports, and they all offering USB 3 speeds. Furthermore, the Omen 15 as well offers HDMI two.0b for the connection of external displays. Gigabit LAN is available too, and users have to limit the distribution of the ports to the two edges. However, since the ports are located far at the rear, there are no problems when using a mouse next to the device.
The HP Omen 15 is equipped with an SD card reader that works at USB iii.0 speeds. This is also confirmed by our measurements, which we performed with our reference memory card (the 64 GBToshiba Exceria Pro UHS-TwoSDXC).
The built-in WLAN chip offers Wi-Fi half dozen and thus the latest standard including Bluetooth five, but the HP Omen 15 couldn't quite implement the advantages of the faster Wi-Fi 6 in the exam. The speeds for sending and receiving data are partly clearly behind the boilerplate that we have measured so far with the Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 module. Alternatively, however, transfer rates of up to 1 Gb/s tin can be achieved via the RJ45 port.
; iperf3 Client (receive) ane m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf three.1.3: Ø904 (709-946)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) one m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø610 (562-651)
The integrated webcam (0.9 MP) delivers a maximum resolution of 1280x720 pixels and has to cope with significant colour deviations. The measured Delta Due east value is fifteen.48. A value smaller than 3 is, therefore, a long way off.
9.4 ∆E
13.one ∆E
19.six ∆Due east
18.6 ∆Due east
20.9 ∆E
17.2 ∆E
ix.6 ∆E
23.half dozen ∆E
19.9 ∆East
19.3 ∆E
thirteen.9 ∆E
thirteen.1 ∆Eastward
xiv.2 ∆E
12 ∆East
25.seven ∆E
11 ∆East
22.five ∆E
21.8 ∆E
1.two ∆E
12.7 ∆E
16.iv ∆East
16.3 ∆Eastward
13.6 ∆E
five.ix ∆Due east
Autonomously from the obligatory safety data and the warranty brochure, in that location are no other accessories when purchasing the HP Omen 15.
Unfortunately, the HP Omen xv doesn't offer a maintenance hatch. That'due south not likewise bad because the lesser comprehend of the base of operations unit can exist removed without bug. You only need to loosen eight screws to detach the cover. The RAM modules also equally the two Chiliad.ii slots for the storage devices are hidden under the base of operations cover. The 2 fans can likewise be hands cleaned this way.
When purchasing the HP Omen 15, the manufacturer only grants a 24-calendar month warranty on the device. This can exist extended to up to 36 months on HP'south online shop (HP Intendance Pack). A one-fourth dimension fee of about 128 Euros (~$152) is charged for this.
The congenital-in chiclet keyboard offers a pleasant typing experience, although the pressure point could have been a bit firmer. Fortunately, the stroke isn't excessively cushioned, which prevents typing from feeling mushy. A number pad has been omitted, leaving more space for the remaining keys. At fifteen x 15 millimeters, the keys take a pleasant size. HP has provided the keyboard of the Omen 15 with a red backlight that can also be optionallydeactivated. Unfortunately, at that place's no dimming function.
HP has installed a generous ClickPad in the Omen fifteen, which makes very good use of the area betwixt the palms rests. At xi.5 x 7.5 centimeters, it'southward just as big as in the HP Pavilion Gaming 16. In terms of visuals, the input area fits well with the overall parcel of the base unit of measurement; information technology also lets the fingers glide smoothly on it. Nevertheless, in that location are some minor problems in the expanse of the corners when it comes to accuracy. This wasn't an outcome in everyday use, though, since the input surface is large enough. "Large enough" is besides the keyword here because the ClickPad is really practiced for multi-touch gestures. The two input keys at the lesser are very quiet when pressed. They ofttimes attract attention with a clearly aural click.
The congenital-in display goes well with the device and the requirements. The fifteen.half dozen-inch panel offers Full Hard disk and thus reaches a pixel density of 141 ppi. Unfortunately, our test device simply reaches the 300 nitsspecified in the technical data in the centre and in the upper corners. On average, the display effulgence is 293 cd/m², which is very shut to the specified value, though. At 87%, the brightness distribution is most on par with the contest.
The high contrast value is the issue of the brightness and the low black level. The Omen 15 can clearly set itself apart from the contest hither. The response times are non the best values but are sufficient for virtually gamers. In addition, the laptop'southward gaming nature is underlined in one case again with the 144 Hz refresh rate. At that place are no restrictions due to clouding in our device. We too couldn't detect PWM, which has a positive outcome on the overall result.
| 308 cd/m² | 296 cd/m² | 301 cd/yard² | ||
| 287 cd/chiliad² | 314 cd/m² | 274 cd/thou² | ||
| 292 cd/m² | 285 cd/m² | 283 cd/m² | ||
Distribution of brightness
LGD05FE
X-Rite i1Pro two
Maximum: 314 cd/yard² (Nits) Average: 293.3 cd/yard² Minimum: xi.vii cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 269 cd/m²
Contrast: 1427:1 (Black: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color two.51 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.four, calibrated: i.71
ΔE Greyscale 3.26 | 0.64-98 Ø5.vi
Gamma: 2.42
| HP Omen xv-ek0456ng LGD05FE, IPS, 1920x1080, fifteen.60 | Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 Panda LM156LF-2F01, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.threescore | Schenker XMG Core fifteen GK5CP6V BOEhydis NV156FHM-N4G (BOE084D), IPS, 1920x1080, xv.60 | Nexoc GH5 515IG LG Philips LP156WFC-SPD1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | MSI Bravo fifteen A4DCR AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED), IPS-Level, 1920x1080, fifteen.60 | HP Omen fifteen-dc1020ng LGD05CE, IPS, 1920x1080, xv.lx | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brandish | ||||||
| Display P3 Coverage | 38.ix | 63.3 | 37.91 | 62 | 38.37 | |
| sRGB Coverage | 58.5 | 91.2 | 57 | 86.8 | 57.6 | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 40.22 | 65 | 39.19 | 62.seven | 39.69 | |
| Response Times | -89% | 27% | -117% | 6% | -152% | |
| Response Time Greyness 50% / Grey lxxx% * | 17 ? | 24.iv ? -44% | eight.8 ? 48% | 34.8 ? -105% | 16 ? six% | forty ? -135% |
| Response Time Black / White * | xi ? | 25.6 ? -133% | 10.4 ? 5% | 25.2 ? -129% | ten.four ? 5% | 29.6 ? -169% |
| PWM Frequency | ||||||
| Screen | -73% | -17% | -34% | -39% | -78% | |
| Brightness centre | 314 | 255.nine -19% | 324 three% | 261 -17% | 311 -1% | 251 -twenty% |
| Brightness | 293 | 246 -xvi% | 296 i% | 254 -13% | 313 7% | 232 -21% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 89 2% | 88 1% | 93 7% | 88 one% | 76 -13% |
| Black Level * | 0.22 | 0.22 -0% | 0.27 -23% | 0.23 -5% | 0.43 -95% | 0.17 23% |
| Contrast | 1427 | 1163 -19% | 1200 -16% | 1135 -20% | 723 -49% | 1476 3% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.51 | 5.xv -105% | 4.07 -62% | 4.71 -88% | iv.5 -79% | 6.2 -147% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.42 | 17.11 -287% | six.39 -45% | 7.half-dozen -72% | 7.97 -lxxx% | 18.half dozen -321% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.71 | iv.83 -182% | ane.49 xiii% | three.67 -115% | ii.65 -55% | 4.8 -181% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.26 | four.2 -29% | iv.01 -23% | 2.76 xv% | three.3 -1% | four.2 -29% |
| Gamma | 2.42 91% | 2.16 102% | 2.6 85% | 2.42 91% | 2.129 103% | 2.32 95% |
| CCT | 6150 106% | 7500 87% | 7350 88% | 7090 92% | 7227 90% | 7454 87% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 36.9 | 59 | 36 | 63 | 36.5 | |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 58 | 91 | 56 | 86 | 57.4 | |
| Full Average (Program / Settings) | -81% / -76% | 5% / -9% | -76% / -49% | -17% / -31% | -115% / -92% |
* ... smaller is better
Out of the box, the measured Delta E 2000 color deviations are only slightly increased compared to the sRGB color space, indicating that HP delivers the Omen 15 with a precalibrated panel. But there is still some potential in the display equally our manual scale shows. We were able to improve the values both in terms of colors and grayscales.
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to modify from 1 colour to the side by side. Slow response times tin can lead to afterimages and tin cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attending to fast response times.
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ seven ms ascension |  |
| ↘ 4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows expert response rates in our tests, only may be besides slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.eight (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.v ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to eighty% Grey | ||
| 17 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9 ms rising |  |
| ↘ viii ms fall | ||
| The screen shows proficient response rates in our tests, simply may exist too slow for competitive gamers. In comparing, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better. This ways that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (37.ane ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply bicycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the man middle. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
| In comparing: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 22039 (minimum: five - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
The built-in IPS panel tin can fully display its advantages during the viewing-angle test. Color changes merely occur in extreme situations like with the four corner images, for instance. If you want to sit on the terrace with the device, you should rather find a place in the shade. All the same, working in the sunshine is still not incommunicable if you can prevent directly sunlight.
The Intel Core i5-10300H together with the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti offers a solid foundation for Full Hd gaming. The xvi GB of RAM and the 512 GB SSD are enough, and if necessary, storage can exist quickly expanded with a second M.2 module.
TheIntel Core i5-10300H offers iv cores and Hyper-Threading. The SoC operates at a base clock speed of 2.5 GHz and tin can reach upwardly to 4.5 GHz on 1 core via Turbo. Withal, the clock-charge per unit limit when using all cores is 4.2 GHz. In the exam, the Cadre i5-10300H has to admit defeat to theAMD Ryzen 7 4800H found in the MSI Bravo xv. The Core i5-10300H tin can still keep upward in the unmarried-thread tests, but the quad-core processor is clearly junior to the octa-cadre SoC in the multithread tests.
Our HP Omen 15 tin can convince with a consequent functioning in the Cinebench R15 multi-loop. Even after some time, the performance of the i5-10300H doesn't subtract, which is very oft the case with other devices. After fifty runs, we register an average score of 897 points. This ways that the Omen 15 is slightly faster than the Nexoc GH15 with the same SoC.
For further comparisons and benchmarks, please refer to our CPU comparison tabular array.
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Average of class Gaming (300 - 736, n=213, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
| MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
| HP Omen 15-ek0456ng | |
| Schenker XMG Cadre fifteen GK5CP6V | |
| Average Intel Core i5-10300H (312 - 470, n=14) | |
| HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Average of class Gaming (1397 - 7382, n=213, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
| HP Omen fifteen-ek0456ng | |
| Schenker XMG Core xv GK5CP6V | |
| Average Intel Core i5-10300H (1397 - 2240, northward=fourteen) | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
| HP Omen xv-dc1020ng | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Average of grade Gaming (108 - 277, n=217, last 2 years) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V | |
| HP Omen xv-ek0456ng | |
| MSI Bravo fifteen A4DCR | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
| Average Intel Cadre i5-10300H (108 - 194, northward=17) | |
| HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Boilerplate of class Gaming (536 - 2909, n=227, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
| Schenker XMG Core fifteen GK5CP6V | |
| HP Omen 15-ek0456ng | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
| Average Intel Core i5-10300H (536 - 921, n=17) | |
| HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
| Blender 2.79 / BMW27 CPU | |
| HP Omen xv-dc1020ng | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
| Boilerplate Intel Cadre i5-10300H (479 - 555, n=13) | |
| HP Omen 15-ek0456ng | |
| Schenker XMG Cadre 15 GK5CP6V | |
| Boilerplate of class Gaming (168 - 732, n=212, last ii years) | |
| MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
| 7-Zip xviii.03 / 7z b iv -mmt1 | |
| Average of class Gaming (2743 - 6506, n=213, last two years) | |
| HP Omen 15-ek0456ng | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
| Schenker XMG Core xv GK5CP6V | |
| Average Intel Core i5-10300H (2945 - 4956, n=xiii) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
| HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
| MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
| vii-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
| MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
| Average of class Gaming (22844 - 76063, n=213, last two years) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V | |
| HP Omen 15-ek0456ng | |
| Boilerplate Intel Core i5-10300H (15146 - 24841, due north=13) | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
| HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
| Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Flake Single-Cadre Score | |
| Average of form Gaming (703 - 1918, north=206, terminal 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 15-ek0456ng | |
| HP Omen 15-ek0456ng | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-10300H (703 - 1241, northward=15) | |
| Schenker XMG Cadre fifteen GK5CP6V | |
| MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
| Geekbench v.3 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Boilerplate of class Gaming (2783 - 13796, northward=206, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
| MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
| HP Omen 15-ek0456ng | |
| HP Omen xv-ek0456ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-10300H (2783 - 4728, n=15) | |
| HWBOT x265 Criterion v2.two / 4k Preset | |
| Average of grade Gaming (4.67 - 22, north=212, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
| MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V | |
| HP Omen fifteen-ek0456ng | |
| Boilerplate Intel Core i5-10300H (six.thirteen - 7.78, northward=13) | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
| HP Omen xv-dc1020ng | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
| Average Intel Core i5-10300H (23.9 - 94, n=xiii) | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
| Average of course Gaming (23.9 - 113, n=211, terminal two years) | |
| HP Omen 15-ek0456ng | |
| R Benchmark ii.5 / Overall hateful | |
| Average Intel Core i5-10300H (0.625 - i.088, northward=13) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V | |
| HP Omen fifteen-ek0456ng | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
| MSI Bravo xv A4DCR | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
| Boilerplate of course Gaming (0.4218 - ane.088, due north=209, last ii years) | |
* ... smaller is amend
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
7170
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
12570 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
36185 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Unmarried CPUs 64Bit
9351 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6229
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
27801
Cinebench R11.v CPU Multi 32Bit
9.36 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 32Bit
76.2 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
2.17 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
10.06 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
75.8 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 32Bit
1.94 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
190 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
114 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
907 Points
Help
The PCMark 10 results of our exam sample are good, and in comparison to the competition, fifty-fifty significantly better. As a result, the HP Omen 15 doesn't need to hibernate here, becausein everyday use,the practiced performance was always convincing and getting piece of work done fast was always possible with the device.
| PCMark 10 | |
| Score | |
| Boilerplate of class Gaming (4077 - 8007, n=184, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Bravo xv A4DCR | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
| HP Omen 15-ek0456ng | |
| Average Intel Cadre i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
| HP Omen fifteen-dc1020ng | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V | |
| Essentials | |
| MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
| Boilerplate of class Gaming (7148 - 11064, n=183, last 2 years) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
| HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
| HP Omen 15-ek0456ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | |
| Productivity | |
| Boilerplate of class Gaming (6161 - 10141, n=183, final two years) | |
| HP Omen fifteen-ek0456ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | |
| Schenker XMG Core xv GK5CP6V | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
| HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
| MSI Bravo fifteen A4DCR | |
| Digital Content Creation | |
| Boilerplate of course Gaming (3670 - 12905, n=183, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Bravo fifteen A4DCR | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
| HP Omen xv-ek0456ng | |
| Boilerplate Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | |
| HP Omen xv-dc1020ng | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V | |
| PCMark 8 | |
| Abode Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
| HP Omen 15-ek0456ng | |
| Average Intel Cadre i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | |
| Average of form Gaming (3181 - 6277, n=78, last two years) | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
| HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
| Average of class Gaming (4265 - 7104, northward=78, terminal ii years) | |
| HP Omen 15-ek0456ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-10300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
| HP Omen fifteen-dc1020ng | |
| PCMark eight Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4853 points | |
| PCMark viii Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 7696 points | |
| PCMark eight Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5507 points | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5127 points | |
| Help | ||
LatencyMon shows modest problems with increased DPC latencies when opening multiple browser tabs in Edge. When playing 4K video material, there are no further increased DPC latencies. These rose significantly only after we started Prime95. Moreover, the iGPU load when playing the 4K YouTube video was almost 25%.
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| HP Omen fifteen-ek0456ng | |
* ... smaller is better
An NVMe SSD (M.2 2280) from Toshiba with a storage capacity of 512 GB serves as the system drive. The transfer rates of the SSD are excellent. Yet, the laptop notwithstanding offers a second M.2 2280 slot that can be occupied with an NVMe or SATA SSD. Moreover, we couldn't find whatever performance drops in the transfer speeds under continuous load. Other configurations of the Omen fifteen come up with a 1 TB SSD out of the box. If you want to shop many games, you should rather consider this device.
You lot tin can find further comparisons and benchmarksin our comparing tabular array.
| HP Omen fifteen-ek0456ng Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G | Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 | Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB | Nexoc GH5 515IG Samsung SSD 860 Evo 512GB | MSI Bravo fifteen A4DCR Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | HP Omen fifteen-dc1020ng WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G | Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark v.2 / 6 | x% | -3% | -46% | 21% | three% | -10% | |
| Write 4K | 120 | 189.6 58% | 102 -15% | 89.6 -25% | 118.3 -i% | 112.1 -7% | 112.eight ? -half dozen% |
| Read 4K | 36.09 | 61.vii 71% | 41.39 15% | 40.88 13% | 43.73 21% | 42.01 sixteen% | 42.7 ? 18% |
| Write Seq | 1778 | 1730 -3% | 1649 -7% | 518 -71% | 2854 61% | 1964 10% | 1489 ? -16% |
| Read Seq | 1362 | 1620 xix% | 1367 0% | 539 -threescore% | 2302 69% | 2065 52% | 1771 ? 30% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 429.1 | 474.2 11% | 379 -12% | 304 -29% | 418.5 -2% | 318.2 -26% | 345 ? -xx% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 493.2 | 528 seven% | 401.ii -19% | 329 -33% | 517 5% | 406.7 -18% | 359 ? -27% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 2936 | 1795 -39% | 3276 12% | 529 -82% | 3008 2% | 2534 -14% | 2257 ? -23% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 3227 | 1880 -42% | 3417 vi% | 561 -83% | 3568 11% | 3438 seven% | 2926 ? -9% |
| Write 4K Q8T8 | 1536 | 1080 ? -30% | |||||
| Read 4K Q8T8 | 1490 | 1232 ? -17% | |||||
| As SSD | -37% | nineteen% | -54% | thirty% | -iv% | -xvi% | |
| Seq Read | 2053 | 1197 -42% | 2261 10% | 524 -74% | 2730 33% | 2955 44% | 2456 ? 20% |
| Seq Write | 2562 | 1637 -36% | 2393 -7% | 495 -81% | 2513 -ii% | 2440 -5% | 1493 ? -42% |
| 4K Read | 42.46 | 56.3 33% | 54.6 29% | 38.93 -8% | 61.4 45% | 40.56 -4% | 44.one ? 4% |
| 4K Write | 97.2 | 159 64% | 118.4 22% | 87.three -ten% | 156.1 61% | 118.6 22% | 119.iii ? 23% |
| 4K-64 Read | 1414 | 583 -59% | 1376 -3% | 380 -73% | 1780 26% | 1283 -9% | 980 ? -31% |
| 4K-64 Write | 1471 | 838 -43% | 2299 56% | 335.7 -77% | 1920 31% | 1538 5% | 1180 ? -twenty% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.079 | 0.062 22% | 0.07 11% | 0.073 8% | 0.063 20% | 0.084 -half-dozen% | 0.08057 ? -2% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.039 | 0.128 -228% | 0.031 21% | 0.039 -0% | 0.025 36% | 0.032 18% | 0.055 ? -41% |
| Score Read | 1662 | 759 -54% | 1657 0% | 471 -72% | 2114 27% | 1619 -three% | 1269 ? -24% |
| Score Write | 1825 | 1160 -36% | 2657 46% | 472 -74% | 2327 28% | 1901 4% | 1449 ? -21% |
| Score Total | 4364 | 2350 -46% | 5175 19% | 1198 -73% | 5518 26% | 4323 -one% | 3326 ? -24% |
| Copy ISO MB/due south | 1913 | 1376 -28% | 500 -74% | 1418 -26% | 1894 ? -1% | ||
| Copy Program MB/due south | 833 | 568 -32% | 283.8 -66% | 392.5 -53% | 552 ? -34% | ||
| Copy Game MB/s | 1667 | 1180 -29% | 319.6 -81% | 907 -46% | 1187 ? -29% | ||
| Total Average (Programme / Settings) | -xiv% / -twenty% | viii% / ten% | -50% / -51% | 26% / 26% | -one% / -2% | -13% / -thirteen% |
* ... smaller is improve
Sequential Read: 1549 MB/due south
Sequential Write: 1608 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 422.ii MB/s
CDM five/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3227 MB/due south
CDM v/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2936 MB/s
CDM five/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 493.2 MB/due south
CDM 5/half dozen Write 4K Q32T1: 429.1 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1362 MB/due south
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1778 MB/south
CDM 5/vi Read 4K: 36.09 MB/s
CDM 5/vi Write 4K: 120 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 1536 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1490 MB/s
Sequential Read: 2053MB/s
Sequential Write: 2562MB/s
Access Time Read: 0.079ms
Access Time Write: 0.039ms
DiskSpd seq_q8t1_read: 2911MB/due south
DiskSpd seq_q8t1_write: 2915MB/s
DiskSpd seq_read: 1532MB/s
DiskSpd seq_write: 1757MB/s
DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_read: 1536MB/s
DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_write: 1544MB/s
DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_read: 46.09MB/s
DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_write: 110.1MB/s
DiskSpd Loop seq_q8t1_read: 2782MB/s
The HP Omen xv is equipped with an Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti GPU that is responsible for 3D rendering. Thanks to Nvidia Optimus, it's possible to switch to the integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 GPU in second usage to salve energy. As a dedicated graphics card, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti has its own VRAM consisting of half-dozen GB of GDDR6 memory. The HP Omen fifteen can affirm itself very well against the competition and fifty-fifty achieve the all-time values in some cases.
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Boilerplate of class Gaming (1925 - 45050, n=198, last two years) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (18610 - 22670, north=24) | |
| HP Omen 15-ek0456ng | |
| Schenker XMG Cadre 15 GK5CP6V | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
| MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
| HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Boilerplate of class Gaming (23059 - 192950, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 15-ek0456ng | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (59839 - 104780, n=eighteen) | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
| HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
| MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Average of form Gaming (1360 - 34993, n=214, final two years) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (14186 - 16488, due north=24) | |
| HP Omen xv-ek0456ng | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
| MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
| HP Omen xv-dc1020ng | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
| 2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
| Average of class Gaming (429 - 13324, n=218, last two years) | |
| HP Omen 15-ek0456ng | |
| Boilerplate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (5335 - 6123, n=22) | |
| Schenker XMG Core fifteen GK5CP6V | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
| HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
| MSI Bravo fifteen A4DCR | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 16523 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Tempest Standard Score | 119496 points | |
| 3DMark Deject Gate Standard Score | 31686 points | |
| 3DMark Burn Strike Score | 12767 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Farthermost Score | 6478 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 4946 points | |
| Assistance | ||
When information technology comes to gaming performance, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti delivers solid results, which are in line with our averages. Users who demand more than performance should expect for a device with a GeForce RTX 2060 or GeForce RTX 2070. Both configurations are offered for the Omen xv. Withal, the latest games tin can also exist played in the native resolution with our exam device'southward configuration.
| The Witcher 3 | |
| 1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing | |
| Boilerplate of form Gaming (151 - 672, n=131, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
| HP Omen 15-ek0456ng | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (177.iii - 298, n=14) | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
| MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
| HP Omen xv-dc1020ng | |
| 1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing | |
| Average of grade Gaming (116.6 - 384, n=132, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen xv-ek0456ng | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (148 - 200, n=14) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
| MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
| HP Omen fifteen-dc1020ng | |
| 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
| Average of course Gaming (lx - 250, n=164, final 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (93 - 120.4, n=17) | |
| HP Omen 15-ek0456ng | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
| HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
| MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of form Gaming (34.7 - 126, n=216, concluding 2 years) | |
| Boilerplate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile (51.half dozen - 65.1, n=21) | |
| Schenker XMG Core fifteen GK5CP6V | |
| HP Omen xv-ek0456ng | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 | |
| Nexoc GH5 515IG | |
| MSI Bravo xv A4DCR | |
| HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
Long gaming sessions aren't accompanied by a declining gaming performance as our The Witcher 3 stress examination shows hither.
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i5-10300H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G: Ø54 (49-58)
Gaming laptops oftentimes accept a bad reputation when information technology comes to their volume. The HP Omen 15 is relatively placidity in idle usage, but at 32.four dB(A), a constant low dissonance is nowadays. The Omen xv does non offer a fan-stop way. Under load, withal, the two fans plow up quite a bit and produce a clearly audible acoustic level. Nosotros measure a maximum value of 51.9 dB(A). The relatively loftier-frequency fan noise makes the volume seem even slightly louder.
Noise Level
| Idle | 32.4 / 32.4 / 32.iv dB(A) | |
| Load | 32.five / 51.nine dB(A) | |
 | ||
| 30 dB 40 dB(A) 50 dB(A) | ||
| min: | ||
, med: 
, max: 
The relatively slim design ensures that cooling under load is properly required to transport the rut generatedout of the case. However, the fifty-°C mark(~122 °F) is non exceeded since the warmest bespeak at the bottom only reaches 48.4 °C (~119 °F ). The remaining areas stay considerably cooler. You lot should still refrain from extended gaming sessions with the device on your lap, though, so that the cooling on the bottom isn't covered.
We checked the temperatures of the CPU and GPU during the stress test and found that the SoC heats up to 99 °C (~210 °F). Consequently, the SoC is scratching the thermal limit that the manufacturer's specifications let. Notwithstanding, you shouldn't await any failures here because the speed gets throttled before. At least theCore i5-10300H ran at an average of 3.37 GHz in this farthermost scenario. Moreover, the GPU's measured temperature was 72 °C (~162 °F ). The GPU clock frequency was besides consistently above the base clock speed here.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Maximum: 40.2 °C = 104 F Average: 33.9 °C = 93 F | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Maximum: 48.4 °C = 119 F Average: 36.three °C = 97 F | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Power Supply (max.) 53.5 °C = 128 F | Room Temperature 24.four °C = 76 F | FIRT 550-Pocket
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Maximum: 25.6 °C = 78 F Average: 24.8 °C = 77 F | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Maximum: 26.7 °C = 80 F Average: 25.iii °C = 78 F | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Power Supply (max.) 32.seven °C = 91 F | Room Temperature 23.two °C = 74 F | FIRT 550-Pocket
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Maximum: 38.half dozen °C = 101 F Boilerplate: 32 °C = xc F | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Maximum: 37 °C = 99 F Average: 31.i °C = 88 F | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Power Supply (max.) 54.4 °C = 130 F | Room Temperature 23.5 °C = 74 F | FIRT 550-Pocket
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.nine °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F for the devices in the form Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 40.3 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.half-dozen to 68.viii °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The lesser heats up to a maximum of 48.4 °C / 119 F, compared to the boilerplate of 43.1 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.8 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 33.7 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher iii, the average temperature for the upper side is 32 °C / xc F, compared to the device average of 33.7 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than peel temperature with a maximum of 29.9 °C / 85.8 F and are therefore absurd to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest surface area of similar devices was 29 °C / 84.two F (-0.9 °C / -1.6 F).
The Bang & Olufsen sound system is located under the palm rests and needs to be reflected off the tabular array. Consequently, using the laptop on soft surfaces tin can pb to a considerably muffled sound quality. The two membranes lack bass due to their size. However, the bass isn't completely suppressed, and then that it can be partially identified. Music and speech are very piece of cake to understand. With the included Bang & Olufsen software, you cull between diverse sound-quality options.
At that place was no groundwork noise or distortion at maximum volume. Withal, nosotros recommend the use of a headset for a perfect sound experience. In improver, the 3.v mm audio jack worked without any issues in our device.
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng audio assay
(-) | not very loud speakers (58.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (thirteen% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only iii.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.vii% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs ii - xvi kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only three.ii% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (five.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.seven% difference to median)
Compared to aforementioned form
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, six% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of six%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, eight% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of three%, boilerplate was twenty%, worst was 65%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 sound assay
(±) | speaker loudness is average but skillful (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.nine% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.four% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | counterbalanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.v% college than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 86% worse
» The all-time had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were improve, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%
The ability consumption of the HP Omen 15 is worse compared to the competition. The device simply requires also much energy in idle usage and is the clear loser. Only the laptop is also ability-hungry under load and needs up to 194 watts in peaks. When playing games, the Omen 15 needs 142 watts on average, which is a bit less, but compared to the competition with the same CPU and GPU configuration, it gets the short terminate of the stick. The meaty power adapter has an output of up to 200 watts and tin can prevent the battery from discharging during the stress test.
| HP Omen fifteen-ek0456ng i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G, IPS, 1920x1080, xv.60 | Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 R7 4800HS, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8, IPS, 1920x1080, fifteen.60 | Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB, IPS, 1920x1080, xv.60 | Nexoc GH5 515IG i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, Samsung SSD 860 Evo 512GB, IPS, 1920x1080, xv.60 | MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5300M, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, IPS-Level, 1920x1080, 15.sixty | HP Omen fifteen-dc1020ng i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.threescore | Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | Average of grade Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ability Consumption | 38% | vii% | 33% | one% | 35% | -22% | -32% | |
| Idle Minimum * | nine.two | 5.i 45% | nine 2% | iii 67% | xi -20% | 4.04 56% | 12.4 ? -35% | xiii.7 ? -49% |
| Idle Average * | 14.half-dozen | 8.four 42% | 12 xviii% | 7 52% | 14 4% | 7.2 51% | 18 ? -23% | 18.ane ? -24% |
| Idle Maximum * | xviii.1 | 9.one 50% | 18 i% | 16 12% | 25 -38% | xi.4 37% | 25.3 ? -40% | 26.3 ? -45% |
| Load Average * | 84 | 55.1 34% | 86 -2% | 85 -one% | 72 14% | 80.eight 4% | 93.5 ? -xi% | 108.5 ? -29% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 142 | 97.5 31% | 126 11% | 86 39% | 100 thirty% | 93.6 34% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 194 | 140.2 28% | 173 11% | 134 31% | 163 xvi% | 144.five 26% | 191.ix ? 1% | 217 ? -12% |
* ... smaller is ameliorate
The HP Omen 15 is equipped with a large 71 Wh bombardment, which the device as well needs, because the high free energy demand in idle usage and nether medium load must be compensated for. The comparing shows that HP'sOmen fifteen can score points with longer battery life despite its poor functioning in terms of energy consumption. However, the reward in the WLAN exam is sometimes very small-scale. Notwithstanding, the Omen 15 could be used for a adept vi.five hours before the battery had to be recharged. By the way, the large battery'scharging fourth dimension is pleasingly brusque at two hours.
If you want to utilize the device for gaming on the go, you should know that both the CPU and GPU performance are somewhat throttled on battery power.
Battery Runtime
| Idle (without WLAN, min brightness) | 11h 43min | |
| WiFi Websurfing (Edge: 85.0.564.51) | 6h 31min | |
| WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Edge: 85.0.564.51) | 5h 50min | |
| Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p | 6h 23min | |
| Load (maximum brightness) | 1h 41min |
| HP Omen 15-ek0456ng i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 70.91 Wh | Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502IU-ES76 R7 4800HS, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, 76 Wh | Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5CP6V i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 46 Wh | Nexoc GH5 515IG i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 48.96 Wh | MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5300M, 51 Wh | HP Omen xv-dc1020ng i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 52.five Wh | Boilerplate of course Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -15% | -50% | -1% | -xl% | vii% | -8% | |
| Reader / Idle | 703 | 425 -twoscore% | 364 -48% | 893 27% | 418 -41% | 951 35% | 601 ? -15% |
| H.264 | 383 | 388 1% | 482 26% | 395 ? 3% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 391 | 315 -19% | 216 -45% | 384 -2% | 268 -31% | 385 -ii% | 354 ? -9% |
| Load | 101 | 116 15% | 44 -56% | 73 -28% | 53 -48% | 71 -xxx% | 90.2 ? -11% |
| Witcher 3 ultra | 59 | 72.5 ? |
Pros
+ IPS display with depression colour-space deviation
+ 144 Hz panel
+ compact and lightweight
+ xvi GB of RAM
+ fast enough for Total Hard disk drive gaming
+ backlit keyboard
+ SD bill of fare reader
+ Wi-Fi 6
+ Thunderbolt 3
+ infinite for a second K.2 2280 SSD (NVMe/SATA)
+ large battery and good battery life
Cons
- loud and hot under load
- no fan-end mode in idle usage
- case feels a lilliputian inexpensive
- fingerprints are visible very chop-chop
- below-average Wi-Fi performance
- loftier energy consumption in idle usage
The HP Omen 15 is a adept gaming laptop that doesn't put a huge paring in your wallet. And nonetheless, the device offers dandy performance with which you tin play even the most modern titles. Our sample device costs nearly 1,250 Euros(~$1,480) at the fourth dimension of testing. The Core i5-10300H offers only four cores compared to the competition, only it can notwithstanding keep upwards well when information technology comes to pure gaming performance. In a direct comparison of CPU performance, the Core i5-10300H has to give way to the hexa-core and octa-cadre processors. Together with the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti, gaming with the laptop is actually fun, which is also due to the great display. At virtually 300 nits, it's not extremely brilliant, but it's sufficient for the intended use. In addition, the virtually very good color-space deviations provide a good rating in the cease. On the other hand, you can certainly criticize the built-in storage device, because 512 GB is not the best nowadays. Fortunately, a second M.two module can exist used to expand the storage infinite. This is besides done quickly because the lesser cover can be removed without much effort.
The HP Omen xv is a practiced gaming laptop with a good port configuration and expert bombardment life.
When it comes to volume, notwithstanding, users take to live with permanent ventilation, which is always audible fifty-fifty in idle usage. Unfortunately, you tin as well tell past looking at the case that this is a budget device. Nonetheless, nosotros want to praise the multiple connections once once again; the inclusion of a Thunderbolt three port results in the Omen 15 also beingness future-proof. This applies to the latest Wi-Fi 6 standard besides, which couldn't deliver its total performance in the examination, though.
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng - 2020-09-18 09/18/2020 v7
Sebastian Bade
Gaming - Weighted Average
Pricecompare
I was already interested in engineering from an early on age, and I was able to study for my dream chore as an IT Systems Electronics Engineer. Afterwards, I started 12 years of military service, during which I learned a lot about applied science and constantly kept my knowledge up to date with the latest developments. As I similar to share my knowledge, I plant Notebookcheck was a very practiced opportunity for this. In addition, I also work a lot with water cooling and network security.
I've been fascinated with applied science always since I got my very first Android smartphone, which was quite a while ago. The ability packed into such a small footprint still amazes me. Learning to plan made my understanding of engineering deeper, and at the aforementioned time, information technology expanded my interest to the area of desktop computers and laptops. All this led me to enjoy reading and watching reviews of new devices, and that's how I stumbled upon Notebookcheck. I immediately found their reviews to be very comprehensive, and luckily, I've even had the chance of translating them since 2019. When information technology comes to the huge field of technology, I'm currently too interested in specializing in Java programming.
Sebastian Bade, 2020-09-20 (Update: 2021-03-12)
Source: https://www.notebookcheck.net/HP-Omen-15-Gaming-laptop-with-good-battery-life.494680.0.html
0 Response to "Hp Omen Gaming Full Hd Ips 173 Notebook Review"
Post a Comment